I'm a bit surprised by the proposed structure: I have come to see the trio of artifact/entity, activity and agent as the kernel elements of most of the defined provenance models, so it's surprising to see them separated here. #g -- On 05/03/2012 16:19, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > For information, Paolo and I have decided to restructure prov-dm (WD5) as follows, > in several components. The intent was to address Jun's comment on core vs common. > > - Activity, Entity, Events > > - Agency and Responsibility > > - Derivations > wasDerivedFrom, revision, quotation, original sources > - Alternate relations (title to be defined) > Alternate, Specialization > - Annotation > - Collections > > So, in other words, we'll drop the common/core. It would be good if it was not > used in the prov-o. > > Cheers, > Luc >Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:06:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:10 UTC