Re: [provo] Proposal for a Structure of the PROVO HTML Document

I'm a bit surprised by the proposed structure: I have come to see the trio of 
artifact/entity, activity and agent as the kernel elements of most of the 
defined provenance models, so it's surprising to see them separated here.

#g
--

On 05/03/2012 16:19, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Khalid,
>
> For information, Paolo and I have decided to restructure prov-dm (WD5) as follows,
> in several components. The intent was to address Jun's comment on core vs common.
>
> - Activity, Entity, Events
>
> - Agency and Responsibility
>
> - Derivations
> wasDerivedFrom, revision, quotation, original sources
> - Alternate relations (title to be defined)
> Alternate, Specialization
> - Annotation
> - Collections
>
> So, in other words, we'll drop the common/core. It would be good if it was not
> used in the prov-o.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>