- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:59:39 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
I'm a bit surprised by the proposed structure: I have come to see the trio of artifact/entity, activity and agent as the kernel elements of most of the defined provenance models, so it's surprising to see them separated here. #g -- On 05/03/2012 16:19, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > For information, Paolo and I have decided to restructure prov-dm (WD5) as follows, > in several components. The intent was to address Jun's comment on core vs common. > > - Activity, Entity, Events > > - Agency and Responsibility > > - Derivations > wasDerivedFrom, revision, quotation, original sources > - Alternate relations (title to be defined) > Alternate, Specialization > - Annotation > - Collections > > So, in other words, we'll drop the common/core. It would be good if it was not > used in the prov-o. > > Cheers, > Luc >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:06:44 UTC