- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:56:27 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:03:50 UTC
Daniel, Thanks for pointing this out. I closed https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/99 because prov:tracedTo fulfills its request. Regards, Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi Tim, > this issue is still raised against the ontology. > In the current draft of the DM it is not stated whether this property should > be transitive or not, so maybe the product of the issue should be changed > to the DM. > > What do you think? > Best, > Daniel > > 2011/9/22 Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> > Khalid > > indeed, they are not transitive. > but dependedOn/2 is. (see model section 5.3.3.3) > not? > > -Paolo > > > > On 9/21/11 10:11 PM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > On 21/09/2011 21:37, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi khalid, > > The assertion "pe1 was used (consumed) by a second process execution pe2" is not valid since entities only can be used. > Ok. So from the provenance ontology point of view, this implies that the > classes Entity and ProcessExecution are disjoint. Which, in turns, > implies that means that wasGeneratedBy and UsedBy are non transitive. > > Khalid > > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:03:50 UTC