- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:35:14 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:35:50 UTC
Hi Tim, this issue is still raised against the ontology. In the current draft of the DM it is not stated whether this property should be transitive or not, so maybe the product of the issue should be changed to the DM. What do you think? Best, Daniel 2011/9/22 Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> > Khalid > > indeed, they are not transitive. > but dependedOn/2 is. (see model section 5.3.3.3) > not? > > -Paolo > > > > On 9/21/11 10:11 PM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > >> On 21/09/2011 21:37, Luc Moreau wrote: >> >>> Hi khalid, >>> >>> The assertion "pe1 was used (consumed) by a second process execution >>> pe2" is not valid since entities only can be used. >>> >> Ok. So from the provenance ontology point of view, this implies that the >> classes Entity and ProcessExecution are disjoint. Which, in turns, >> implies that means that wasGeneratedBy and UsedBy are non transitive. >> >> Khalid >> > > >
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 15:35:50 UTC