Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

Hi Jim,



On 01/26/2012 01:45 PM, Myers, Jim wrote:
>
>
> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> +0 -- these seem like 'sub-class of' to me -- having an identifier for 
> the general relationship type along with the source and target seem to 
> be enough to identify a particular relationship instance. +0 because 
> they are still domain concepts and hence in the universe in that sense
>
>

I don't think it's the case:
- an activity may be associated with an agent with different roles.
- e2 could be derived (precise derivation with activity a) from e1, 
multiple times, maybe because e1 is used by a several times.

Luc

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm