- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:16:47 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Stian, On 01/26/2012 09:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:00, Stian Soiland-Reyes > <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > >>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, >>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, >>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After >>> removal belong to the universe of discourse. >>> >> -1 - these are relations between and mainly based on the primitives >> mentioned above. >> > Changed my mind slightly: > > +1 for Association (because an agent can be associated in different > roles, so this is similar to Usage) > -1 for the rest > I am trying to understand the rationale. Are you saying: "If we need to be able to enumerate objects, then they should be identifiable. Otherwise, say for wasDerivedFrom(e2,e1) there can be only one relation...." Though can you have different attributes qualifying different instances of the derivation? I don't follow. Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:17:29 UTC