- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:17:57 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F202B35.4080000@ncl.ac.uk>
Hi as discussed, I agree with all the points below -Paolo On 1/25/12 3:38 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > All, > > 24h to go. We are trying to use the outcome of this vote to structure tomorrow's call. > Thanks for your help. > > Luc > > On 01/24/2012 01:56 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> All, >> >> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to identifiers before F2F2. >> >> For information, we agreed on the following last week: >> / *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by all participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity >> records" and otherwise) SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either reusing an existing identifier, or introducing a new >> identifier) for the objects described." (intent) / >> >> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that belong to universe of discourse. >> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series of proposals. Can >> you express your support or not in the usual manner. On Thursday we will discuss >> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus. >> >> Regards, >> Luc >> >> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse. >> >> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event, >> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of >> discourse >> >> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, >> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, >> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After >> removal belong to the universe of discourse. >> >> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of >> discourse >> >> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse >> This includes Account Record. >> >> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse >> Note >> >> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse >> >> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of >> discourse. >> >> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 16:18:24 UTC