Re: complementOf -> viewOf: proposed text

Hi James,


To add on to this, did we really mean

e1 and e2 provide two different characterization of the same entity

or did we mean

e1 and e2 provide two different characterization of the same THING?

Luc



On 01/16/2012 03:49 PM, James Cheney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This seems relevant to the 3-level vs. 2-level discussion (issue 212):
>
> Do we want to distinguish between "things" (that can change over time) and "entities" (pieces of information about things bounded by an interval in time)?  Or do we want to view a "thing" as the all-encompassing entity that all more-specific entities about it specialize?
>
> --James
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>    
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> But, what is the answer to this question? I dont know. I think the text should clarify it.
>>
>> On 01/16/2012 02:31 PM, Paolo Missier wrote:
>>      
>>> When you write "e1 and e2 provide two different characterization of the
>>> same entity",
>>> which "same entity" do you mean? Is it e3 in the example?
>>>        
>> Luc
>>
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Monday, 16 January 2012 16:04:26 UTC