- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:34:33 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I noticed this issue raised on the formal semantics is still open. It was raised originally by Luc, and the description was: > The subgroup dealing with semantics should consider how characteristics of an entity state generated by a process execution are determined (or not) by this process execution and the entity states this process process execution. There is a concern that in an open world we may have not asserted the actual entity states that caused this entity state. I believe that since then, PROV-DM has been rewritten to reflect a consensus that we should avoid mandating semantic constraints concerning causality or determination, so this concern is no longer relevant to PROV-SEM. Thus, I propose to close the issue after next week's teleconference unless there is further discussion before then. --James On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-24: Semantic document address "P and things used by P determine values of some of X's invariant properties (less strict)" > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/24 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 18:35:22 UTC