- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:04:53 -0500
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAtgn=Re=CwOCQ_rgMQxOWxiCHsexOY7pLvH-8RS777JT=bKTA@mail.gmail.com>
My point exactly. Luc has allayed my fears. Jim On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes < soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 17:27, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > > I'm not sure why this is a requirement. This greatly complicates > > representations in RDF. Rather than saying: > > > > :writingThisEmail prov:wasControlledBy rpi:JimMcCusker. > > > > I would have to say: > > > > :writingThisEmail prov:wasControlledBy :jim. > > :jim prov:identifier rpi:JimMcCusker. > > > no, rpi:JimMcCusker is already a characterisation of a thing in the > world (you), and hence is also an entity. You are a person, not a > URI, but rpi:JimMcCusker is one (characterised) way to talk about you > as a person. This characterisation - even if not expressed - will > always be bounded, for instance it probably does not characterize > "you" before you were conceived, and it probably does not include the > car you are driving today. > > Basically any existing URI can be said to be an entity, because by > their nature they characterize something. (This is also an argument > that nothing can be disjoint from prov:Entity - but that's a separate > issue) > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 17:08:34 UTC