- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:04:39 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Tim, I've revisited this... On 02/12/2011 23:41, Timothy Lebo wrote: > GK noted "Removed "normal" here." > > But it occurs in several places in the document: > > "normal web mechanisms." removed > "using normal web retrieval" removed. > "On the Web, the normal mechanism for retrieving information" In this case, the sentence is describing the "normal" mechanism, so I've left it in. > "dereference the URI using normal retrieval mechanisms" Changed to "dereference the URI using HTTP" - hence completing a desription of "normal" web retrieval > "Normal HTTP content negotiation" removed. > I recommend to either: > > 1) remove "normal" in each of these usages. > 2) specify somewhere what "normal" means (as opposed to, e.g., _not_ normal HTTP content negotiation). I think the above addresses these, and I propose to close this issue (again). #g > Thanks, > Tim > > > > On Nov 23, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> PROV-ISSUE-167 (TLebo): What is a "normal web resource"? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/167 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >> >> What is "normal web resource" as opposed to "abnormal" web resources in: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html >> >> 2. Accessing provenance information >> >> "When publishing provenance as a normal web resource, the provenance-URI should be discoverable using one or more of the mechanisms described in section 3. Locating provenance information." >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 15:28:52 UTC