W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-469 (zero-timespan-entity): Can entity's have zero timespan? [prov-dm-constraints]

From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:04:30 +0100
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7AB67C24-81F5-4F4E-A6DA-0F5D5E035771@inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
OK.  To resolve ISSUE-469, I will remove "strictly" in generation-precedes-invalidation.  Marked pending review.

--James

On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is a typo; we meant for the only strict orderings to be the two involving derivation.
>> Easy to fix by removing "strictly" if you agree.
> 
> I agree, although I would only keep the one about wasGen(e1) strictly
> preceeding wasGen(e2) in the derivation, not the usage strictly
> preceeding generation, which I see no reasoning for.
> 
> This is ISSUE-470.
> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> 
> 


-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 16:05:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:19 UTC