- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:38:25 +0100
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have now done this and since there has been no further discussion, I assume the issue can be closed. --James On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:04 PM, James Cheney wrote: > OK. To resolve ISSUE-469, I will remove "strictly" in generation-precedes-invalidation. Marked pending review. > > --James > > On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> I think this is a typo; we meant for the only strict orderings to be the two involving derivation. >>> Easy to fix by removing "strictly" if you agree. >> >> I agree, although I would only keep the one about wasGen(e1) strictly >> preceeding wasGen(e2) in the derivation, not the usage strictly >> preceeding generation, which I see no reasoning for. >> >> This is ISSUE-470. >> >> -- >> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >> School of Computer Science >> The University of Manchester >> >> > > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 09:38:47 UTC