- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:44:23 +0100
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > I think this is a typo; we meant for the only strict orderings to be the two involving derivation. > Easy to fix by removing "strictly" if you agree. I agree, although I would only keep the one about wasGen(e1) strictly preceeding wasGen(e2) in the derivation, not the usage strictly preceeding generation, which I see no reasoning for. This is ISSUE-470. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 15:45:11 UTC