W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-469 (zero-timespan-entity): Can entity's have zero timespan? [prov-dm-constraints]

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:44:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtn5+7p9UJGEnHhm5W_348icRwO6SKMWwcK8ZAUW=2uR5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> I think this is a typo; we meant for the only strict orderings to be the two involving derivation.
> Easy to fix by removing "strictly" if you agree.

I agree, although I would only keep the one about wasGen(e1) strictly
preceeding wasGen(e2) in the derivation, not the usage strictly
preceeding generation, which I see no reasoning for.

This is ISSUE-470.

Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 15:45:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:19 UTC