- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:17:20 +0200
- To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTi=-=EzZw8QkdTJDfZrCZJS_KEEAHA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paul, all. Sorry for the late response. By clarifying the location concept, I wasn't referring to changing the example, I meant that we have to be careful when stating that a resource has some provenance information located somewhere, because if we don't model it properly it can be misunderstood with the location the resource is referring to. For example, a travel guide can refer to Paris, but it may be created in England. I have also added some additional provenance questions about the example. Please feel free to modify them if you don't agree with them. Best, Daniel 2011/5/9 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> > Hi Daniel, > > Could you send a modified version of the example text to the list? > > It's probably premature to talk about any existing vocabulary. I think, we > should first just agree on the example and then after that discuss how the > example illustrates the concepts from the charter. > > For the provenance questions, please go ahead and edit the wiki and let the > list know the changes you made. > > thanks! > Paul > > > Daniel Garijo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> from my part, I really like the example. However, I would like the >> location concept to be further clarified. >> The RDF data could have been produced/edited in England but refer to >> govermental data about somewhere else. >> We have to make sure to distinguish between this 2 kind of locations, >> since the final user can be confused. >> >> As for the concept illustrations, are we going to develop one with the >> list of provenance concepts, or are we >> going to develop several illustrations showing how to handle the example >> with different vocabularies (OPM, PML, etc.)?, >> (as James suggested in the telecon). >> >> Best, >> Daniel. >> >> PS: If we have more provenance questions, shall we edit the wiki >> directly or open a new discussion? >> >> 2011/5/6 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com <mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>> >> >> >> Hi All: >> >> We agreed at yesterday's telecon[1] that we would adopt an >> example-based approach to discussing the charter concepts. >> >> You can find a data journalism example here [2]. This is strongly >> inspired by the News Aggregator scenario from the incubator but has >> been simplified. If also adds an element of linked data to the mix >> in particular it tries to illustrate a connection to web architecture. >> >> It covers all concepts listed in the charter. We added a little bit >> around location to begin to address the comments from Carl [3]. >> >> What do you think? Is this a good example to work from? >> >> It would be good to get an agreement on the example by Monday next >> week so we can begin discussing concept illustrations before next >> week's telecon. >> >> regards, >> Paul >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-05-05#resolution_3 >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample >> [3] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011May/0006.html >> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 14:17:51 UTC