Re: discussion example

Hi Daniel,

Could you send a modified version of the example text to the list?

It's probably premature to talk about any existing vocabulary. I think, 
we should first just agree on the example and then after that discuss 
how the example illustrates the concepts from the charter.

For the provenance questions, please go ahead and edit the wiki and let 
the list know the changes you made.

thanks!
Paul


Daniel Garijo wrote:
> Hi all,
> from my part, I really like the example. However, I would like the
> location concept to be further clarified.
> The RDF data could have been produced/edited in England but refer to
> govermental data about somewhere else.
> We have to make sure to distinguish between this 2 kind of locations,
> since the final user can be confused.
>
> As for the concept illustrations, are we going to develop one with the
> list of provenance concepts, or are we
> going to develop several illustrations showing how to handle the example
> with different vocabularies (OPM, PML, etc.)?,
> (as James suggested in the telecon).
>
> Best,
> Daniel.
>
> PS: If we have more provenance questions, shall we edit the wiki
> directly or open a new discussion?
>
> 2011/5/6 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com <mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>>
>
>     Hi All:
>
>     We agreed at yesterday's telecon[1] that we would adopt an
>     example-based approach to discussing the charter concepts.
>
>     You can find a data journalism example here [2]. This is strongly
>     inspired by the News Aggregator scenario from the incubator but has
>     been simplified. If also adds an element of linked data to the mix
>     in particular it tries to illustrate a connection to web architecture.
>
>     It covers all concepts listed in the charter. We added a little bit
>     around location to begin to address the comments from Carl [3].
>
>     What do you think? Is this a good example to work from?
>
>     It would be good to get an agreement on the example by Monday next
>     week so we can begin discussing concept illustrations before next
>     week's telecon.
>
>     regards,
>     Paul
>
>     [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-05-05#resolution_3
>     [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample
>     [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011May/0006.html
>
>

Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 10:55:05 UTC