Re: discussion example

Hi all,
from my part, I really like the example. However, I would like the location
concept to be further clarified.
The RDF data could have been produced/edited in England but refer to
govermental data about somewhere else.
We have to make sure to distinguish between this 2 kind of locations, since
the final user can be confused.

As for the concept illustrations, are we going to develop one with the list
of provenance concepts, or are we
going to develop several illustrations showing how to handle the example
with different vocabularies (OPM, PML, etc.)?,
(as James suggested in the telecon).

Best,
Daniel.

PS: If we have more provenance questions, shall we edit the wiki directly or
open a new discussion?

2011/5/6 Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>

> Hi All:
>
> We agreed at yesterday's telecon[1] that we would adopt an example-based
> approach to discussing the charter concepts.
>
> You can find a data journalism example here [2]. This is strongly inspired
> by the News Aggregator scenario from the incubator but has been simplified.
> If also adds an element of linked data to the mix in particular it tries to
> illustrate a connection to web architecture.
>
> It covers all concepts listed in the charter. We added a little bit around
> location to begin to address the comments from Carl [3].
>
> What do you think? Is this a good example to work from?
>
> It would be good to get an agreement on the example by Monday next week so
> we can begin discussing concept illustrations before next week's telecon.
>
> regards,
> Paul
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-05-05#resolution_3
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011May/0006.html
>
>