Re: IVPT (invariant view or perspective on thing)

I totally agree with you.
Best,
Daniel

2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>

> While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our
> discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually ended up in
> any of the documents we produce.
>
> I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I expect us to
> settle on a better term when we can see better what we're talking about and
> what we actually need to say.
>
> #g
> --
>
> Jun Zhao wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya, Paolo, Khalid
>> and I put together a document [1] highlighting issues and goals to focus on
>> during the F2F1.
>>
>> The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be updated and
>> evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list. We hope this document
>> could help with setting expectation for the F2F1 and guidance on the near
>> focus of the WG.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>>
>
>