Re: IVPT (invariant view or perspective on thing)


On 9 Jun 2011, at 15:38, "Graham Klyne" <> wrote:

> While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually ended up in any of the documents we produce.
> I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what we're talking about and what we actually need to say.
> #g
> --
> Jun Zhao wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya, Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1.
>> The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list. We hope this document could help with setting expectation for the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG.
>> [1]
>> Best regards,
>> Jun

Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 14:46:39 UTC