- From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:24:40 -0400
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 17:25:10 UTC
Satya, I think you have it right that we were all trying to distinguish between the abstract definition and an execution/instance of that defined process, but I'm not sure I understand 'merging' them. Do you mean relating them via a process concept (a'fourier transform' process with a recipe link to some Fortran code and a process execution of that transform on a particular piece of data? ). If so, perhaps 'recipe link' is really just 'process link'? Or do we really need to separate process definition from process formally? Jim From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Satya Sahoo Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 9:48 PM To: Provenance Working Group WG Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-3 (define-recipe-link): Definition for Concept 'Recipe link' [Provenance Terminology] Hi all, I have added a definition for Recipe and suggest merging this concept with concept "Process execution" to create concept "Process". http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptRecipeLink#Definition_by_Satya Thanks. Best, Satya
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 17:25:10 UTC