- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:56:54 +0100
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- CC: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Daniel, On 01/06/2011 16:36, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Hi Jun, all. > I think that it refers to the generation provenance that you talk about in > the last lines of your definition. Having "generation" as a concept would > allow to add more metadata about when was a resource/resource state/resource state representation > generated, where, etc. > > If we treat the generation as a property, we will have to add more properties > to describe the generation of the resource (like wasGeneratedAtTime, wasGeneratedAtPlace, etc). That's an interesting thought. But note that in my definition of generation I refer it as a relationship between a resource and a process execution. Maybe you would like to propose a broader definition of generation on the wiki page? cheers, Jun > Daniel > > 2011/5/31 Graham Klyne<GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> > I agree. > > #g > -- > > > > Jun Zhao wrote: > I propose Generation should be a relationship rather than a concept. > > See http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptGeneration#Definition_by_Jun > > cheers, > > Jun > > On 20/05/2011 08:07, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-8 (define-generation): Definition for Concept 'Generation' [Provenance Terminology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/8 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: Provenance Terminology > > The Provenance WG charter identifies the concept 'Generation' as a core concept of the provenance interchange language to be standardized (see http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter). > > What term do we adopt for the concept 'Generation'? > How do we define the concept 'Generation'? > Where does concept 'Generation' appear in ProvenanceExample? > Which provenance query requires the concept 'Generation'? > > Wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptGeneration > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 16:57:19 UTC