- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:24:21 +0100
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- CC: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Jim, I just took a look at the SADI pages, but I can't find a specification. There's code, training courses, academic papers but AFAICT no actual specification. Even best practices should be specified if they're to be recommended - especially if we're looking to achieve some level of interoperability between users and providers. It sounds good, but if we're to suggest it I think we need to point at a specification. #g -- Jim McCusker wrote: > Another interesting possible suggested access mechanism is SADI, which > is a native RDF/OWL web service framework, is simple to use and > implement, and the developers are about pursue the W3C recommendation > process for it. > > http://sadiframework.org > > Jim > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Khalid Belhajjame > <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: >> Thanks Graham, >> khalid >> >> On 24/07/2011 08:25, Graham Klyne wrote: >>> re: >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/8100a2f745df/paq/provenance-access.html >>> >>> Agreed, we don't need to be prescriptive. My intent was to suggest this >>> as a recommended mechanism, not the only mechanism. I'll look to clarify >>> this. >>> >>> #g >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 12:59:10 UTC