- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:29:32 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 11:30:01 UTC
Khalid I don't think we have ever agreed on that, but I should really check the voting history. The latest definition of IVP-of (or complement-of) is sufficiently precise (i.e., algorithmic) that transitivity follows, but derivation is purely asserted and as such there is no ground to say that it is transitive -- unless we say axiomatically that it should be. -Paolo > > PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45 > > Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame > On product: Conceptual Model > > > If we agree that "isDerivedFrom" and "IVPof" are transitive, then I would suggest that this should be specified in the model working draft. > > khalid
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 11:30:01 UTC