- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:12:46 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
I suggest we can add it for isDerivedFrom in the next version of the document. Let's see if we can agree on a definition of ivpOf and its properties. Luc On 07/24/2011 11:59 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45 > > Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame > On product: Conceptual Model > > > If we agree that “isDerivedFrom” and “IVPof” are transitive, then I would suggest that this should be specified in the model working draft. > > khalid > > > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 08:13:17 UTC