Re: Misleading label in prov-aq.ttl prov:has_query_service

Wow, this is old…:-)

I must admit the details are hazy. But the ontology files were maintained by Tim Lebo on a github repository:

https://github.com/timrdf/prov-wg <https://github.com/timrdf/prov-wg>

if and when he made an update then he had some magic to automatically generate the various owl files in different serializations. I have a forked repository:

https://github.com/iherman/prov-wg <https://github.com/iherman/prov-wg>

which seems to be slightly behind Tim's version, and which I then use to update the files on /ns.

I am not sure Tim is still active in this. If yes, I hope he can take care of this and then we can go from there; if not, we will have to figure out how to proceed. 

Note that the number of different prov related ontology files are /ns are large, and I am not sure how this came into the picture (see the attachment below). Hence my problem of trying to 'simply' edit this by hand.

Cheers

Ivan





> On 7 Dec 2018, at 06:31, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com <mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Stian
> 
> Good catch. Yes we should update the label to match the property name.
> 
> @ivan - I forgot the process? 
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
>> On 7 Dec 2018, at 02:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk <mailto:soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
>> 
>> PROV folks,
>> 
>> In http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl> I found:
>> 
>> prov:has_query_service
>>   a owl:ObjectProperty ;
>>   rdfs:comment "Indicates a provenance query service that can access provenance related to its subject or anchor resource."@en ;
>>   rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq# <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq#>> ;
>>   rdfs:label "hasProvenanceService" ;
>>   :aq "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430>/"^^xsd:anyURI ;
>>   :category "access-and-query" ;
>>   :inverse "provenanceQueryServiceOf" .
>> 
>> 
>> So there's a mismatch between CURIE prov:has_query_service  and
>> rdfs:label hasProvenanceService
>> 
>> As this is in camelCase and looks like a namespace term, this might
>> confuse people who load the ontology in OWL editors. 
>> 
>> 
>> So which one is the winner?
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf <https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf>
>> uses prov:has_query_service and the whole doc uses has_query_service 20
>> times, while "hasProvenanceService" does not appear. 
>> 
>> I think this is a remnant in the OWL file left behind after this change:
>> 
>> <dt>2013-01-04 13:11 +0000 7b4580bd6d52 Graham Klyne</dt><dd>Fix some section cross-references; rename 'prov:hasProvenanceService' as 'prov:hasQueryService'</dd>
>> 
>> Should we update prov-aq.ttl (and *.rdf etc) to have correct rdfs:label
>> "has_query_service"?
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> The University of Manchester
>> https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
>> https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>