- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 06:31:43 +0100
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>, ivan@w3.org
Hi Stian Good catch. Yes we should update the label to match the property name. @ivan - I forgot the process? Thanks Paul > On 7 Dec 2018, at 02:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > PROV folks, > > In http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl I found: > > prov:has_query_service > a owl:ObjectProperty ; > rdfs:comment "Indicates a provenance query service that can access provenance related to its subject or anchor resource."@en ; > rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq#> ; > rdfs:label "hasProvenanceService" ; > :aq "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/"^^xsd:anyURI ; > :category "access-and-query" ; > :inverse "provenanceQueryServiceOf" . > > > So there's a mismatch between CURIE prov:has_query_service and > rdfs:label hasProvenanceService > > As this is in camelCase and looks like a namespace term, this might > confuse people who load the ontology in OWL editors. > > > So which one is the winner? > https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf > uses prov:has_query_service and the whole doc uses has_query_service 20 > times, while "hasProvenanceService" does not appear. > > I think this is a remnant in the OWL file left behind after this change: > > <dt>2013-01-04 13:11 +0000 7b4580bd6d52 Graham Klyne</dt><dd>Fix some section cross-references; rename 'prov:hasProvenanceService' as 'prov:hasQueryService'</dd> > > Should we update prov-aq.ttl (and *.rdf etc) to have correct rdfs:label > "has_query_service"? > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > The University of Manchester > https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ > https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > >
Received on Friday, 7 December 2018 05:32:09 UTC