- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 01:41:36 +0000
- To: public-prov-comments@w3.org
PROV folks,
In http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl I found:
prov:has_query_service
a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:comment "Indicates a provenance query service that can access provenance related to its subject or anchor resource."@en ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq#> ;
rdfs:label "hasProvenanceService" ;
:aq "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/"^^xsd:anyURI ;
:category "access-and-query" ;
:inverse "provenanceQueryServiceOf" .
So there's a mismatch between CURIE prov:has_query_service and
rdfs:label hasProvenanceService
As this is in camelCase and looks like a namespace term, this might
confuse people who load the ontology in OWL editors.
So which one is the winner?
https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf
uses prov:has_query_service and the whole doc uses has_query_service 20
times, while "hasProvenanceService" does not appear.
I think this is a remnant in the OWL file left behind after this change:
<dt>2013-01-04 13:11 +0000 7b4580bd6d52 Graham Klyne</dt><dd>Fix some section cross-references; rename 'prov:hasProvenanceService' as 'prov:hasQueryService'</dd>
Should we update prov-aq.ttl (and *.rdf etc) to have correct rdfs:label
"has_query_service"?
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
The University of Manchester
https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Friday, 7 December 2018 01:42:02 UTC