Re: Illegal punning in prov-o.ttl, prov.ttl imports broken

We may not need to record a change in the erratta but I think more
visibility the better.

@Stian - thank you for raising it on these lists.

I would also like to double check the changes to see if it's all in working
order before any changes to the official ontologies.


Paul

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> > On 12 May 2017, at 16:47, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
> soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:41:45 +0200, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> >> However… I am a little bit uneasy. First of all, it must be recorded
> >> in the errata, that is for sure. But I would also prefer to see some
> >> record of wide consensus that this is indeed what has to be done (and
> >> record the consensus in the relevant erratum) before changing the
> >> ontology files, because we are, essentially, creating a discrepancy
> >> between the standard and the ttl files.
> >
> > I disagree on the need for the errata as it would not cause any
> > discrepancy with the standard (which doesn't even distinguish between
> > Object Properties or Annotatoin Properties).
>
> If that is indeed the case, then I agree with you.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> >
> > I do agree we could check wider if we're correct in my suggested
> > approach, so we don't do any double-trouble or break something else.
> >
> > I'll raise it on the semantic-web list and OWLAPI list.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stian Soiland-Reyes
> > The University of Manchester
> > http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
> > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>