> On 12 May 2017, at 16:47, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:41:45 +0200, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> However… I am a little bit uneasy. First of all, it must be recorded >> in the errata, that is for sure. But I would also prefer to see some >> record of wide consensus that this is indeed what has to be done (and >> record the consensus in the relevant erratum) before changing the >> ontology files, because we are, essentially, creating a discrepancy >> between the standard and the ttl files. > > I disagree on the need for the errata as it would not cause any > discrepancy with the standard (which doesn't even distinguish between > Object Properties or Annotatoin Properties). If that is indeed the case, then I agree with you. Ivan > > I do agree we could check wider if we're correct in my suggested > approach, so we don't do any double-trouble or break something else. > > I'll raise it on the semantic-web list and OWLAPI list. > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > The University of Manchester > http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Friday, 12 May 2017 13:49:12 UTC