RE: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please

Dear Sir

The present over simplistic handling of preferences, and the almost total absence of negotiation functionality in present privacy languages ,are what should be addressed .What was stressed by several ,incl. myself in Ispra , was the need for declarative properties , combined with in-language unification of conditions , verificationof declarative goals ,associated possibly with call to external true equilibrium calculations (Pareto or auctions)  .
If such functionality is not embedded , the pivacy languages will only cary the finite set of unilaterally defined fixed policies set by the core language ,something people will not want or expect .
I trust the above text is quite specific !
Regards



L-F Pau , Professor Mobile business       lpau@rsm.nl



-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org]
Sent: Fri 11/05/2007 17:31
To: Louis-Francois Pau
Cc: public-privacy06ws@w3.org
Subject: Re: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please
 
Dear Prof. Pau, 

thanks for the excellent suggestion. Part of the issue is that 
preferences/management languages are nearly identical to rules 
languages unless they are really simple. But we should not cut out the 
simple things. Do you have a suggested wording for the inclusion into 
the scope?

Best, 

Rigo Wenning

On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Louis-Francois Pau wrote:
> Isn't the charter including the needed privacy functionality
> MANAGEMENT and configuration  functions in the selected privacy
> specification languages such as XACML, P3P ,or extensions needed
> extensions thereto in other ISO languages (ie for SLA specification ,
> access control,preference settings ,  etc) ? Regards
>



--------------------------------Disclaimer--------------------------------

De informatie  verzonden in dit e-mail bericht  inclusief de bijlage(n) is

vertrouwelijk  en is  uitsluitend  bestemd  voor de geadresseerde  van dit

bericht. Lees verder: http://www.eur.nl/email-disclaimer

The information i
n this e-mail message  is confidential and may be legally
privileged. Read m
ore: http://www.eur.nl/english/email-disclaimer
----------------------------
----------------------------------------------