Re: Draft IG Charter -- Your Comments, Please

Dear Prof. Pau, 

thanks for the excellent suggestion. Part of the issue is that 
preferences/management languages are nearly identical to rules 
languages unless they are really simple. But we should not cut out the 
simple things. Do you have a suggested wording for the inclusion into 
the scope?

Best, 

Rigo Wenning

On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Louis-Francois Pau wrote:
> Isn't the charter including the needed privacy functionality
> MANAGEMENT and configuration  functions in the selected privacy
> specification languages such as XACML, P3P ,or extensions needed
> extensions thereto in other ISO languages (ie for SLA specification ,
> access control,preference settings ,  etc) ? Regards
>