Re: new security/privacy review questions

If i try to summarize Privacy as a state free from observation and Security
as a state free from danger, what will ensure that an individual be free
from any observation be it PII or PDI or something else, i have no
particular preference.

Ambarish

On Saturday, 4 July 2015, Craig Spiezle <craigs@otalliance.org> wrote:

> +1. Agree with David
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:21 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:28 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, welcome Tiffany, and thank you for sharing your views.
> >>
> >> Indeed, the scope of privacy and data protection laws (i.e. the
> definition of “personal data/personal information”) varies depending on the
> jurisdiction.
> >>
> >> A common, but not universal definition is:
> >>
> >> “any information [relating to/about] an identified or identifiable
> individual”
> >>
> >> (found, for example, in the OECD Privacy Guidelines, Council of Europe
> Convention 108 and APEC Privacy Framework)
> >>
> >> My personal preference is not to use “PII”, but rather, “personal data”
> or “personal information”, as needed.
> >
> > yes.  I am quite fond of ‘personally derived information’ i.e.
> information that derives from the actions of a single person.
> >
> >
> > David Singer
> > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
अंबरीष श्रिकृष्ण नातू


Sent from Gmail Mobile