- From: Craig Spiezle <craigs@otalliance.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:40:37 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- CC: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Tiffany DUMAS <tiffany.dumas@live.com>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
+1. Agree with David Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:21 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:28 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote: >> >> Yes, welcome Tiffany, and thank you for sharing your views. >> >> Indeed, the scope of privacy and data protection laws (i.e. the definition of “personal data/personal information”) varies depending on the jurisdiction. >> >> A common, but not universal definition is: >> >> “any information [relating to/about] an identified or identifiable individual” >> >> (found, for example, in the OECD Privacy Guidelines, Council of Europe Convention 108 and APEC Privacy Framework) >> >> My personal preference is not to use “PII”, but rather, “personal data” or “personal information”, as needed. > > yes. I am quite fond of ‘personally derived information’ i.e. information that derives from the actions of a single person. > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > >
Received on Friday, 3 July 2015 23:41:09 UTC