- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:23:35 +0000
- To: Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
- Cc: xsl-fo Community Group <public-ppl@w3.org>
On 4 January 2014 14:16, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote: > On Sat, January 4, 2014 1:27 pm, Dave Pawson wrote: > ... >> A POV - XSL-FO is too complex a language (written largely by JC which > > Not exactly. My POV, the complexity is such that James may well have written it? IMHO it isn't much more obvious than DSSSL > > It is more true to say that James Clark wrote most of DSSSL [5]. > >> should mean something) hence users perhaps would be happy with >> something simpler / easier to understand. > > Are you arguing for CSS? If not, what? I'm not proposing solutions, just options. In this case some form of simpler syntax / terminology. I hope you'll agree that CSS syntax (if not semantics) is easier than FO? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Saturday, 4 January 2014 14:24:03 UTC