Re: Revise group description?

Fair point.
A simple user case.
  Many disparate documents, all in XML. I want 'decent' (easy to read)
print. I generally use docbook stylesheets or tweak my own generic.
Key point. No layout requirements which might be seen as verging on
paranoia and harking back to manual typesetting.

DaveP

On 29 December 2013 10:03, Patrick Gundlach <gundlach@speedata.de> wrote:
> Its interesting to see the different backgrounds we all have and thus we have different demands for creating paged media.
>
> Perhaps we should collect more use cases to define the group? Perhaps the use cases are too distinct from each other that it's impossible to get them all in one group?
>
> I have now invested more than two man-years into my product to be able to create the documents I want (demanding product catalogs for example) which I was unable to do with any other software that I am aware of. Perhaps the requirements are totally different from those for the other people here?
>
> I think we should discuss the goal of our group before we can move forward. XMLPrague could be a good place to have at least some people together.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> speedata UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> -------------------------------------
> Telefon  030/57705055
> Mobil    0178/1967142
> Mail     gundlach@speedata.de
> Web      www.speedata.de
>
> Eisenacher Straße 101
> 10781 Berlin
> -------------------------------------
> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 135360 B
> Geschäftsführer: Patrick Gundlach
> USt-IdNr: DE278023065
>
>



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Sunday, 29 December 2013 10:10:12 UTC