- From: Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:00:51 +0200
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
Well, it is good practice in an international environment to give people around the globe enough time to react. An example: The Apache Software Foundation usually allows at least 72h, maybe even longer if a vote goes over a weekend. Thanks for reopening the poll! On 03.04.2012 21:24:15 Tony Graham wrote: > On Sat, March 31, 2012 2:58 am, Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > So, err, what do we do now, exactly? :-) > > > > I'd like to see a few more people vote. But failing that I'd say that 2 > > votes for Tony trumps 2 votes for rotation. Just my opinion. > > Thank you. We really are too polite in this CG: the CGs where the rock > stars decide amongst themselves which of them will be the chair have a > much easier time of it. > > The biggest take-away from the poll may be that people either don't care > or didn't notice it in time. > > I've reopened the poll since I've had one indication that a member didn't > notice the existence of the poll until after it closed. There may be > others who have an opinion that wasn't able to be counted. The reopened > poll runs until Friday, 6 April. > > To answer the question you asked, in the end, someone selects one or more > boxes on the 'Participants' page and clicks on the button to name the > selected as chair(s). > > Regards, > > > Tony. Jeremias Maerki
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:13:45 UTC