- From: Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:13:11 +0200
- To: public-ppl@w3.org
I'm wondering if it would make sense to split up the listing of the XSL-FO processors in: - actual XSL-FO processors (Examples: FOP, AntennaHouse, etc.) - stand-alone XSL-FO editors (which usually bundle one or more XSL-FO processors) (Examples: Ecrion Designer, XSLfast etc.) - and integrated (output management) solutions in which XSL-FO processors are used and which might or might not contain an XSL-FO based editor. (Examples: Assentis DocBase, Ecrion Rendering Server, Thunderhead etc.) I think that would also make it easier to build tables that compare the capabilities of various products. It would also be useful to compile a list products in the HTML/CSS corner which are targeted at print output. On 28.03.2012 11:24:44 Tony Graham wrote: > I've added pages for listing XSL-FO processors: > > http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/wiki/XSL-FO_Processors > > and publicly-available stylesheets: > > http://www.w3.org/community/ppl/wiki/Public_Stylesheets > > that we can all extend. > > Over time, it would be useful to add information about platforms and > output formats for the XSL-FO processors, but this list already has one > more than the original on the XPPL WG page. > > Regards, > > > Tony. Jeremias Maerki
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:14:23 UTC