- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:33:38 +0200
- To: "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, "Public POWDER" <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Hi +1 for the resolution and also a question: Why don't we allow both FOAF and DC? -- Kai > -----Original Message----- > From: public-powderwg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-powderwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phil Archer > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 3:01 PM > To: Public POWDER > Subject: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: use dcterms for the maker > element and rename to creator > > > Following my exchange with Dan Bri just now [1], I'd like to > propose that we change the name of the POWDER <maker> element > to <creator> and change the transform so that this becomes > <dcterms:creator>. > > Note that the legacy (and commonly seen) dc:creator just > takes a string whereas dcterms:creator has the range of dcterms:Agent. > > This does not prevent using FOAF terms within a dcterms:Agent > class (which is good because FOAF has some very useful terms > already) but it does eliminate POWDER's formal dependence on FOAF. > > We can consider the resolution properly next week at the f2f > but if there are any comments ahead of that, please speak up. > > Thanks > > Phil. > > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2008Jul/0028.html > onwards > > -- > Phil Archer > Chief Technical Officer, > Family Online Safety Institute > w. http://www.fosi.org/people/philarcher/ > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2008 13:34:24 UTC