- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:58:59 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, public-powderwg@w3.org, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 08:40 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > The best way to get this moving is to get discussion going on the > list; as a consensus emerges, other people will either have to offer > up objections / alternatives, or get out of the way. What's stopping > it now is inertia... Hmm... I thought Phil did a pretty good job of documenting a fair amount of consensus in the form of deployed software. I don't see what's to discuss. Haven't we already reached the point where the burden is on those who want something different? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 22:58:40 UTC