- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:06:44 +0100
- To: Public POWDER <public-powderwg@w3.org>
Sorry, I realise I messed up the references. The document itself is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/ The comment about CardSpace is documented at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2007Jun/0004.html And the revised UC for user-generated tags is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2007Jun/0013.html Phil Archer wrote: > > The POWDER Use Cases document was published as a Working Group Note on > 25 May [1] when we stated that we'd welcome comments through until this > Friday, 8th July. > > We have received the following comments to date: > > 1. From Patrick Petit [1] concerning Microsoft's CardSpace ID management. > 2. From Kjetil Kjernsmo offering a revised version of the use case > concerning user-generated tags [2] > 3. I have had an e-mail exchange with Kai Scheppe concerning use of > POWDER relating to URL lists. The use case can be summarised as: > > User wants to view a specific web page. > The child protection software checks the label on the site whether it > fits the profile the user has selected. > This profile may utilize, aside from the actual labelling information, > various repositories of specifically recommended websites (white lists) > or specifically blocked websites (black lists). > Thus the label should provide the ability to store information about > which repositories are to be used. > > The Working Group will discuss these at the face to face meeting next > week with the aim of publishing a revised UC doc shortly afterwards. > Although the review period for this document ends this week, the WG > will, of course, continue to welcome comments on usage scenarios. > > Cheers > > Phil. > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/ > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-powderwg/2007Jun/0013.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 12:06:56 UTC