W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > June 2011

AW: Re: "geo:" URIs

From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:20:32 +0200
Message-ID: <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D466506E33440@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at>
To: <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>, <public-poiwg@w3c.org>

Honestly - you were the only person ever mentioning the Moon/Mars cases - but everybody has a hobby ;-)


----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: public-poiwg-request@w3.org <public-poiwg-request@w3.org>
An: public-poiwg@w3c.org <public-poiwg@w3c.org>
Gesendet: Tue Jun 28 18:41:14 2011
Betreff: Re: "geo:" URIs

On 28 June 2011 13:32, Jens de Smit <jens@layar.com> wrote:
>> What about non-WGS84 CRSs, so that the schema is a) future-proof and
>> b) capable of expressing PoIs on other bodies, such as  the Moon or
>> Mars?
> Both GML and RFC5870 allow for specifying a different CRS. I don't
> know if there is an interstellar CRS yet, but the great thing is that
> we do not have to come up with it because we can use any CRS we want.

Thanks, Jens.

Yes, it is a great thing, which is why I asked for it to be included
in RFC5870 ;-)

It's important that we can refer unambiguously to, say, the locations
of features on The Moon, or the exploratory journeys of Mars landers.

I'm not familiar with GML, hence the question; it's good to know that
it allows for other CRSs.

Andy Mabbett
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 17:21:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:30 UTC