W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > October 2010

[minutes] POI WG minutes 19 Oct 2010

From: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:39:49 -0400
Message-Id: <2A43C3C5-341F-43E4-84A6-7DD8E130B92D@w3.org>
To: public-poiwg@w3.org
Hi all,

The minutes from the first POI WG meeting are available online at:
	http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html

and as text below.

The actions created are as follows:
[NEW] ACTION: Andrew to post to member list a call for hosts [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Everyone to mail Gary with terms that you'd like to see defined in the terminology wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: Everyone to send a brief overview of what your objectives are for this WG [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: ggale to start terminology page on POI wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: Jonathan to introduce Matt and Andy to Korean potential IEs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: Karl to write up some 'non-AR' use cases for POI data format [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action04]
[CLOSED] ACTION: Matt to describe tools [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action01]

I forgot to mention during the call that you can prefix side comments that don't need to be logged with "/me".

I mentioned on the call that we each have a dedicated wiki page at:
	http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/User:username

where "username" is your username.  Perhaps a good exercise to ensure we all can log in to and edit the wiki might be to update your user pages, you could copy your objectives email into it, or put whatever you want there.  If you run into any problems, please let me know.

Thanks,

-Matt

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

            Points of Interest Working Group Teleconference

19 Oct 2010

   [2]Agenda

      [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-poiwg/2010Oct/0002

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Marco_Marengo, Andy_Braun, Karl_Seiler, Matt_Womer,
          Vinny_Reynolds, Vinod_Hegde, Gary_Gale, Carl_Reed,
          Jacques_Lemordant, Dan_Brickley

   Regrets
          Jens_de_Smit

   Chair
          Andy

   Scribe
          Matt

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Roll call
         2. [6]Introductions
         3. [7]Administrative
         4. [8]Tools
         5. [9]Tentative Face to Face Dates
         6. [10]Use case creation
         7. [11]Wrap up
         8. [12]Action review
     * [13]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________

Roll call

   <scribe> Scribe: matt

   matt: Please say your name when you start to talk so I can learn
   names
   ... and voices.

Introductions

   Andy: I'm Andy Braun a Director of Technology Strategy at
   SonyEricsson.

   matt: I'm the team contact for this group. I also do Voice browsing
   and Geolocation.

   Carl: I'm the CTO of the OGC. I've been working in geospatial
   technologies since 1969. I'm very interested in anything to do with
   standards around geospatial services and encodings.

   marengo: I'm Marco (and Luca) from Telecom Italia. We're working in
   research for AR technologies.

   Karl: I work at NavTeq, I'm part of a team that does POI
   systems/descriptions. I'm interested because the business supply
   chain for POI interchange is getting very long and that drives us
   down the road of shared descriptions.

   Ronald: I'm head of R&D at Layar. Normally Dirk, the CTO would be
   here as well. We're interested in POI representations and want to
   contribute to the standards.

   Vinny: Vinny and Vinod from DERI. I'm researching geospatial
   information in the semantic Web. We're new to the AR area, but we
   think linked data is important.

   Vinod: We're looking at how AR can benefit from linked data.

   cperey: Christine Perey, I helped start the W3C AR workshop in
   Barcelona and just organized a 2 day meeting on AR standards last
   week.

   Jacques: I'm researching a system for indoor/outdoor navigation for
   blind people.

   Gary: Working at Nokia, and prior to that at Yahoo, been working in
   geospatial for ten years or so. Been working on the place database
   available at maps.ovi.com

   <ggale> maps.ovi.com ... that's the one

   <danbri> [14]http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/

   danbri: Working at Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. I used to work
   at W3C. Most of my work is around the Web of Data stuff. I edit the
   basic geo vocabulary and worked to organize the AR dev camp here a
   few months ago.

   <danbri> (i work at [15]http://www.vu.nl/nl/index.asp)

     [15] http://www.vu.nl/nl/index.asp

Administrative

   Andy: (Sorry for the google links, I work in Google docs and it
   apparently embedded these within the mail)

   <Andy> [16]http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/

   -> [17]http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=45386&public=1
   participants

     [17] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=45386&public=1

   Andy: Probably another 6-8 people who have expressed interest in
   joining that aren't on there. We'll have more over the next few
   weeks surely.
   ... The public email list is: public-poiwg@w3.org -- just to
   reiterate: all technical discussions should happen on the mailing
   list. These minutes will be posted to the mailing list. We can
   either release a draft set of minutes to the member mailing list,
   give folks 24 hours or so to peruse them and then push them out, or
   we could just push them to the public list.
   ... Quick show of hands? Do you want an opportunity to review the
   minutes before sending them out, or is it fine to send them out
   immediately?

   <Karl_> i vote for immediately

   <cperey> +1

   <vinny> no opinion

   <ggale> +1 for public

   <Carl_Reed> +1

   <Ronald> +1 for public

   RESOLUTION: Make minutes public immediately without review.

   Andy: The member only list we will only use primarily for
   member-only face to faces. Announcing details of the calls, etc,
   things we might need not be public.
   ... I'll put a poll out by tomorrow asking everyone to vote on a
   call time. I picked this one because it seemed reasonable enough for
   most people. I'll put a poll up with a few selections and send it to
   the mailing list.

   <Karl_> eu afternoons = NA mornings = good

   <Andy> ACTION: Matt to describe tools [recorded in
   [18]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-1 - Describe tools [on Matt Womer - due
   2010-10-26].

Tools

   (Matt describes usage of Tracker, Zakim, and RRSAgent)

   ACTION-1?

   <trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Matt Womer to describe tools -- due
   2010-10-26 -- OPEN

   <trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/actions/1

     [19] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/actions/1

   ISSUE-1?

   <trackbot> ISSUE-1 does not exist

   close ACTION-1

   <trackbot> ACTION-1 Describe tools closed

   <ggale> Information overload ... is all this documented online
   somewhere?

   <Zakim> matt, you wanted to say this is how queuing works

   <danbri> see [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim_Tips and
   nearby

     [20] http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim_Tips

   <ggale> This is deeply cool but head has reached capacity!

   <danbri> -if you find useful things, the wiki is a good place to
   share

   -> [21]http://www.w3.org/Guide/ member guide

     [21] http://www.w3.org/Guide/

   <cperey> Matt, will there be a wiki for this group?

   <Andy> cperey, yes i will bring up next

   <Andy> Or actually prior to Use case discussion

   matt: this group is great!

   -> [22]http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Main_Page wiki

     [22] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Main_Page

   <Andy> [23]http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Main_Page

     [23] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Main_Page

   Andy: Regarding enforcement of "Good Standing" -- I don't want to
   get into it, but in general if you want to participate in the WG,
   you should participate. I don't think we'll enforce much of it.

   <danbri> (imho 'good standing' is more about people making/keeping
   commitments (not promising too much), rather than 'not putting in
   enough hours')

   Andy: One thing I'll ask for this meeting: does the ten o'clock
   Boston time work well for people? If we don't have West Coast people
   maybe 9 am would work?

   <vinny> fine for vinny/vinod in ireland

   <cperey> +1 for Beijing

   <Carl> 10 AM east works best for me

   Andy: Earlier time is probably more convenient for Asia.

   <Karl_> ok for me

   <cperey> at 9 AM Eastern

   <marengo> +1 to keep this timeslot

   <danbri> this is ok for me

   <Ronald> ok for me

   <Matt>Unfortunately Tuesday is the only day I have packed full, but
   other days works for me at this time.

   (or any time)

   Andy: Feel free to put your comments in IRC, I'll review them before
   putting out the poll.

   <Karl_> frequency?

   <cperey> who cannot do 9 AM Eastern?

   <cperey> weekly

Tentative Face to Face Dates

   <Carl> Hard for me but Raj Singh would be OK (he is in Boston)

   Andy: I need to square away meeting space, but at the moment, I'm
   looking at December 7 and 8, maybe the 9th.

   <vinny> where ?

   Andy: I'm looking at Atlanta, Georgia, US.

   <Karl_> 7th is bad, 8-9 is OK

   <cperey> what are some of the other locations you are considering?

   <JonathanJ> +1 8-9

   Andy: Alex Hill has talked about co-hosting it at Georgia Tech. That
   would also let us look at some of their projects as a break from the
   working meeting.

   <Carl> I am in Sydney at OGC TC and then ISO meetings at that time

   cperey: Have you considered other locations? Maybe Germany or
   European cities?

   <vinny> i can organise dublin probably

   Andy: The only European city I have access to is Copenhagen. That's
   an option, but getting people to go to Scandinavia in December might
   be hard.

   <Carl> As the OGC has a great interst in POI as it relates to
   gazetteer, perhaps we can host an Australia/Asia ad-hoc in Sydney?

   cperey: Maybe others on the call can host?

   <ggale> I can certainly look at hosting here in Berlin

   <ggale> Not necessarily the first meeting though

   Andy: I'll put my proposal on the member list, let's have that
   discussion between now and the end of this week.

   <ggale> Is Atlanta the only option for the US?

   <ggale> I have a preference for the Bay Area but understand that
   doesn't work for everyone

   <Andy> ggale I could also manage San Francisco

   <Andy> ACTION: Andy to post to member list a call for hosts
   [recorded in
   [24]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action02]

   <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Andy

   <scribe> ACTION: Andrew to post to member list a call for hosts
   [recorded in
   [25]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action03]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-2 - Post to member list a call for hosts
   [on Andrew Braun - due 2010-10-26].

Use case creation

   Andy: Last week at ISMAR Christine put together a meeting of various
   organizations to discuss AR standards. As a team we came up with
   three generic AR use cases. Thought it might be worthwhile to walk
   through those AR use cases.

   <cperey> see
   [26]http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Three_Use_Cases.pdf

     [26] http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Three_Use_Cases.pdf

   <ggale> Would also help if members state briefly on IRC what their
   prime objectives are for participation on the WG ... ?

   <ggale> Works for me

   <danbri> could also action people to send that as intro message
   before next week's call

   <Carl> By email OK?

   <Carl_Reed> Sorry - need to use correct name tag. Thanks, JonathanJ

   cperey: The three use cases were: 1. assisting a user through a
   process in the real world 2. 'social AR' in essence, though not
   necessarily shared. user attaches or attributes content to something
   in the real world 3. a system that supports bi-directional
   interaction between two or more users with a real-time communication
   component to it.

   <cperey> feel free to check out the other materials created

   Andy: Probably a good first one to walk through would be the 'Guide'
   use case. It's generic enough for the typical use case of overlaying
   a wiring diagram over an engine for maintenance work.

   <cperey> the content is aggregated here:
   [27]http://www.perey.com/ARStandardsMeetingOutputs.html

     [27] http://www.perey.com/ARStandardsMeetingOutputs.html

   Andy: the 2nd would be similar to the typical AR browser. Finding a
   place, investigating a POI, etc. Other thoughts on this one? Are
   there specific things in POI that we should include?

   <Carl_Reed> How familiar is this group with gazetteers?

   <cperey> ditto, please share

   Karl_: Just to state my objectives: the world is suffering a lack of
   shared descriptions for places of business, etc.

   <cperey> that was not the objective of the AR use cases we developed

   <ggale> Absolutely +1 Carl

   Karl_: There have been various attempts at it, but there hasn't been
   one congealed standard for it, how that helps AR is one obvious
   stepping stone.

   <danbri> for describing businesses, there is a healthy amount of
   [28]http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/ data floating
   around lately

     [28] http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/

   ggale: That mirrors my objectives on this. In addition to working
   out who means what across the multitude of siloed POI data at the
   moment.

   <Carl_Reed> I will post links and information on gazetteers to the
   wiki. Gazetteers in a sense are a shared description of a place. The
   shared description are done by authorities, such as the UN or NGA

   Matt: We obviously have non-AR use cases, we just happened to have
   this stuff from the AR workshop last week. Perhaps an action to
   start collecting the non-ar use cases.

   Andy: Agreed. As Karl said POIs are important to AR. If we have a
   single description of business etc then we want to make sure it fits
   the AR use cases as well. The fact that we had some AR work done
   already made it a good discussion point.

   Karl: Between myself and Gary we can come up with the most common
   use cases for business listings. Facilitates search, and navigation.

   <ggale> Carl ... want to set up a call on this and discuss before
   next WG call?

   <ggale> Me == gary.gale@nokia.com

   <scribe> ACTION: Karl to write up some 'non-AR' use cases for POI
   data format [recorded in
   [29]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action04]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-3 - Write up some 'non-AR' use cases for
   POI data format [on Karl Seiler - due 2010-10-26].

   <Karl_> karl.seiler@navteq.com

   <Carl_Reed> Yes, good to have POI use cases independent of AR - AR
   is just one class of apps that can utilize POI

   <cperey> +1 to Matt's suggestion

   <Zakim> danbri, you wanted to mention feedback from a colleague,
   "Why are they only doing points?" / do we literally mean lat/long
   *points*, or rather, entities of interest?

   danbri: I mentioned the group to a colleague who is doing some work
   on geodata in Somalia. He took a very precise reading of the word
   "points" -- x, y coordinates. I took it to mean entities of
   interest, and a signal to the world that we're starting basic and
   building up.
   ... We're going to start with things and attach properties rather
   than try to reinvent GML.

   <cperey> who is speaking? Carl?

   Karl: I'd love for us to discuss the scope of things we're trying to
   describe. One thing is locations: points, locations, geofenced
   things, etc. Not to be confused with places of interest, which can
   have multiple locations, a building that has a name, etc.

   <Carl_Reed> There is an ISO definition for "point" in ISO 19107.

   <cperey> I like that!

   Karl: What Gary was alluding to was what's the core-shared common
   set of descriptions of a business.

   <cperey> but an entity of interest could be a person, or a car or an
   object which is not fixed in space

   Karl_: I rankle at the word business, many of them aren't
   businesses.

   <Andy> I second Christine's point about people

   Gary: We need to understand a few different pieces of terminology:
   places, points, ??-oids. Unless we lock this down at an early stage
   there will be bedlam from people inferring things.

   <Andy> In fact this is why I think some use cases are important to
   see what scenarios need to be covered by the spec.

   <Zakim> Carl_Reed, you wanted to give brief description of gazetteer

   Carl: I think it might be useful to look at what's been done in
   gazetteer -- these have been used for quite a long time in GIS and
   related industries.

   <danbri> back in the summer I posted a list of kinda 'test cases',
   [30]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2010Aug/0031.ht
   ml ... list of potential 'things that we might consider POIs'; in
   Karl's sense, these are places (unbounded), not just locations.

     [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2010Aug/0031.html

   Carl: Also in mobile LBS. Also known as yellow pages. They're
   collections of entities of interest. Landmarks, cities, towns,
   roadcrossings, etc. They'll have some sort of coordinate to specify
   the location on the earth along with a set of properties.
   ... There are some really large gazetteers out there already. ??
   maintains one with 2 million points. Many nav companies have these,
   may not call them gazetteers.

   <Andy> Karl with a K, do you have a gazetteers

   Carl: At OGC we're doing a standardized interface for these.

   <Zakim> matt, you wanted to suggest a terminology wiki page

   <cperey> what about the terminology which we began in Seoul?

   <scribe> ACTION: ggale to start terminology page on POI wiki
   [recorded in
   [31]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action05]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-4 - Start terminology page on POI wiki [on
   Gary Gale - due 2010-10-26].

   <cperey> what sort of terminology will be included?

   <Zakim> danbri, you wanted to ask re types/categories in gazetteer
   world

   <Carl_Reed> For all things geospatial, ISO TC 211 maintains a public
   terms and definitions application. The OGC and ISO communities have
   developed these terms and definitions.

   danbri: To what extent do gazetteers have common types, categories,
   etc?

   <Andy> cperey this may be different as it is POI while that was
   heavily AR

   Karl_: Obviously from the nav side of the business we have a number
   of them with tens-going-on-hundreds of millions of places in them.
   We really struggle with categorization.
   ... We have our own plus have to pay homage to NAICS and NACE
   standards.

   <danbri> "we really struggle with the issue of categorisation ...
   one one hand, easy to use hierarch system, on other paying homage to
   [missed] standards"

   Karl_: We've been wrestling with this for quite a while.

   <danbri> (btw I heard at .nl GeoNovum meeting last week that W3C
   SKOS is getting used more and more for code lists in Geo)

   <cperey> I think a terminology developed by this WG should contain
   concepts and terms which are useful to both

   <danbri> [32]http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/

     [32] http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/

   <danbri> replaces SIC codes

   <danbri> "The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
   is the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying
   business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing,
   and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business
   economy."

   <danbri> NACE -
   [33]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_classification_of_econo
   mic_activities_in_the_European_Community (i think :)

     [33] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_classification_of_economic_activities_in_the_European_Community

   Karl_: Categories are a key point of complexity for the challenge
   ahead.

   <cperey> +q

   <cperey> I would like to recommend that people review
   [34]https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As8Gui74DrCDdHcyUU1WS0N
   Gc2V6RC13YzFCUVBaUVE&hl=en

     [34] https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As8Gui74DrCDdHcyUU1WS0NGc2V6RC13YzFCUVBaUVE&hl=en

   <cperey> for terminology

   <danbri> somewhat related
   [35]https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29334

     [35] https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29334

   ->
   [36]https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As8Gui74DrCDdHcyUU1WS0N
   Gc2V6RC13YzFCUVBaUVE&hl=en#gid=0 beginning of terminology

     [36] https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As8Gui74DrCDdHcyUU1WS0NGc2V6RC13YzFCUVBaUVE&hl=en#gid=0

   <Carl_Reed> Wikipedia info on gazetteer - good start -
   [37]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazetteer

     [37] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazetteer

   <danbri> Carl_Reed, perhaps for another meeting would you be able to
   give some background of
   [38]https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29334 ?
   (the changereq to use SKOS for codelists in GML...)

     [38] https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29334

Wrap up

   <cperey> +1 for discussion on the mailing list

   Andy: Maybe we should do an around the room, perhaps on the public
   mailing list makes more sense.

   <Carl_Reed> ISO TC 211 Terms -
   [39]http://www.isotc211.org/TC211_Multi-Lingual_Glossary-2010-06-06_
   Published.xls

     [39] http://www.isotc211.org/TC211_Multi-Lingual_Glossary-2010-06-06_Published.xls

   Andy: Just a short intro email to describe what you're looking to
   get out of the group.

   <Ronald> +1 mailing list

   Andy: Anyone object to doing it on the mailing list? Speak up now.

   <vinny> +1

   <ggale> +1 no objections

   Andy: No objections.

   JonathanJ: Could you tell me what is the condition of invitation of
   invited expert in this WG?

   <JonathanJ> I hope to invite some korean invited experts

   Matt: I think we'll follow the typical rules for IEs rather than the
   HTML5 method of "anyone can be IE".

   <scribe> ACTION: JonathanJ to introduce Matt and Andy to Korean
   potential IEs [recorded in
   [40]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action06]

   <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - JonathanJ

   <scribe> ACTION: Jonathan to introduce Matt and Andy to Korean
   potential IEs [recorded in
   [41]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action07]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-5 - Introduce Matt and Andy to Korean
   potential IEs [on Jonathan Jeon - due 2010-10-26].

   <Carl_Reed> Korea and Japan have been working several ISO standards
   (in conjunction with the OGC) for "place", such as place identifiers

Action review

   -> [42]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#ActionSummary

   <scribe> ACTION: Everyone to send a brief overview of what your
   objectives are for this WG [recorded in
   [43]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action08]

   <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Everyone

   <ggale> All -- free free to mail me with terms you'd like to see
   defined in the terminology wiki

   <scribe> ACTION: Everyone to mail Gary with terms that you'd like to
   see defined in the terminology wiki [recorded in
   [44]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action09]

   <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Everyone

   <cperey> Gary, please see the terms in this figure
   [45]http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Landscape_of_AR_topics.pdf

     [45] http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Landscape_of_AR_topics.pdf

   Andy: if everyone could double check their ability to edit in the
   wiki please.

   -> [46]http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/User:Mdw my user page

     [46] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/User:Mdw

   ggale: I just looked on the participants page, but I don't see a
   link to login.

   <cperey> signing off now, good night!

   <cperey> thanks!

   <Andy> thanks good night

   [47]http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=45386

     [47] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=45386

   <ggale> Thanks all ... good first call ... been enjoyable

   <Ronald> I cannot login on the wiki, gives an error message

   <JonathanJ> Thanks all

   <Karl_> adios

   <Andy> bye

   <Ronald> bye

   <ggale> TTFN have a good night all

   <Ronald> yes

   <Ronald> Yes, I can see that one... let me verify my account details

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: Andrew to post to member list a call for hosts
   [recorded in
   [48]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action03]
   [NEW] ACTION: Everyone to mail Gary with terms that you'd like to
   see defined in the terminology wiki [recorded in
   [49]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action09]
   [NEW] ACTION: Everyone to send a brief overview of what your
   objectives are for this WG [recorded in
   [50]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action08]
   [NEW] ACTION: ggale to start terminology page on POI wiki [recorded
   in [51]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action05]
   [NEW] ACTION: Jonathan to introduce Matt and Andy to Korean
   potential IEs [recorded in
   [52]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action07]
   [NEW] ACTION: Karl to write up some 'non-AR' use cases for POI data
   format [recorded in
   [53]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action04]
   [CLOSED] ACTION: Matt to describe tools [recorded in
   [54]http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-poiwg-minutes.html#action01]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [55]scribe.perl version 1.135
    ([56]CVS log)
    $Date: 2010/10/19 18:31:18 $

     [55] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [56] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 18:39:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:26 UTC