- From: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:12:42 +0200
- To: Jens de Smit <jens.desmit@surfnet.nl>
- Cc: cperey@perey.com, public-poiwg@w3.org
>"Limiting the availability of the message >to only a few people sounds like a guarantee that the message will never >be read until the moment we're all continuously wearing AR glasses and >even then your friends have to stumble upon the message." "Hay! I'm Over Here!" [/massive arrow pointing down from the sky] Or "Meet here for drinks later?" Or how about geolocated reminders for you or any of your family/housemates to buy something when they are within a certain area? Sharing geolocated points doesn't have to be strictly in an AR context, of course, but its still useful to have private map points and annotations between friends and family with can be viewed with ar software. Not that it has to be geolocated either. Annotations can apply to images or dynamic points too. Say, seeing comments from who liked what next to a restaurant menu, or a list of your friends views on films next to a cinema schedule. (as it happens I believe strangers views can be usefull here too, but most people trust their friends a lot more, because they already know how much their views correlate to their own) For that mater, theres plenty of other uses both professional and personal where you dont want the data seen by the whole world, but only by a select group; Building plans, Infrastructure maintenance, monitoring health and fitness, planning a wedding (just of the top of my head). Theres even AR application for security planning, or police investigations. Things that most certainly shouldn't be public, and preferably on a complete isolated server. Then theres gaming applications. A team based game would probably need data only visible to the side your playing with. Your "attack plan" or whatever probably shouldn't be visible by your enemy's. There must be hundreds of use's for AR only for select groups....you only have to open your mind a bit :) >"The combination of AR and social media provides an excellent tool to >discover social media around you that is _not_ coming from the friends >you already know. Restricting messages to the same old groups destroys >this unique selling point of AR social media." It does private an excellent tool. No question about that. But the existence of email doesn't stop the internet existing :? Its not a restriction. Not an either/or. You simply have both. In this case, as different layers on your field of view. Private and public streams. Read-only and Read/Write too. The unique saleing point of AR is in-context information. Thats useful in both many<>many, group<>group and even 1<>1 forms of communication. Saying everything in AR has to be seen by everyone is a restriction. Both should be possible, just as they are on the Internet. The hope though is, that it wont end up being controlled by just a few small companies. On 22 July 2010 15:39, Jens de Smit <jens.desmit@surfnet.nl> wrote: > On 22/07/2010 15:25, Thomas Wrobel wrote: >> I think whats being looked for is something that selectively allows >> messaging to just your friends, like Facebook only broadcasts to >> people you (in theory) have let. Twitter is still a form of mass >> broadcast really, as it exists without account/viewing restrictions. >> >> Theres quite a few systems out there (or coming out) that let you >> "glue" data to objects or areas and store them globally in the >> company's own database. Theres certainly big applications for that >> alone, "annotating the world" combined with user-submitted content >> could very quickly get quite powerful. (provided the is a big enough >> pool of users able to contribute) >> >> But, aside from potential moves by facebook, Ive yet to see any real >> private-messaging done in AR space, and even then its restricted to >> just that company hosting the data for you. > > Hey, > > I fail to see the application where private/restricted messaging in AR > space is really useful ("AR" here being mobile and geolocated). Messages > in this environment are already very restricted because you need to be > in the vicinity to read them. Limiting the availability of the message > to only a few people sounds like a guarantee that the message will never > be read until the moment we're all continuously wearing AR glasses and > even then your friends have to stumble upon the message. > > The combination of AR and social media provides an excellent tool to > discover social media around you that is _not_ coming from the friends > you already know. Restricting messages to the same old groups destroys > this unique selling point of AR social media. > > Regards, > > Jens >
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2010 14:20:10 UTC