- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:05:30 -0400
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, Pointer Events WG <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 4/9/15 3:21 PM, Rick Byers wrote: > Assuming Houdini keeps it's plan to meet in Sapporo, then I'll > definitely be there. > > I'm not sure what the best time frame is for a F2F meeting. Ideally I > think we'd have some concrete data on the compat impact of the capture > changes I propose so we can have a data-driven debate about the design > choices. But it's going to be awhile before we're far enough along in > our blink implementation to gather that data. If we could get the > data sooner via the Mozilla or IE implementations then it would make > sense to meet sooner to plan a course of action. Seattle or Mountain > View would be fine with me. If folks want an excuse to visit roaring > Waterloo (Toronto) Canada, then I'd also be happy to host here :-). > > Rick > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com > <mailto:Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>> wrote: > > It's too early for me to commit to being in Sapporo this year. > Between this group, Houdini, and other standards related topics I > have my fingers in, I'd say there's a decent chance. > > For this group in particular, I think a face to face meeting of > some variety is a good idea to bootstrap the work for a V2 spec. > Perhaps sooner than TPAC though. Microsoft (probably) could host > a WG F2F either in Redmond or Mountain View if there's interest. > That doesn't necessarily preclude meeting at TPAC also. > Hi Doug, All, Although there are a number of advantages to f2f meetings, and I would support meeting at TPAC2015 if there was a clear and compelling need to meet then, I don't think we will have sufficient data to make an informed decision by April 30. As such, I recommend PEWG not formally meet at TPAC2015. Of course, if others have an opinion - either way - please do speak up. That said, I agree with Jacob and Rick that as the work on PEv2 progresses, if there appears to be a need for a f2f meeting we should certainly plan to have one. -Thanks, ArtB
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 12:06:00 UTC