RE: Add direction-specific pan values to touch-action?

Hearing no objections, I went ahead and implemented #1:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/commit/7df96182a451cce1e556fa147f12c1d3857d47aa 

So Pointer Events V2 is now open for business and accepting pull requests. :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:37 AM
To: Rick Byers; Jacob Rossi
Cc: Sangwhan Moon; Dave Methvin; public-pointer-events@w3.org
Subject: Re: Add direction-specific pan values to touch-action?

On 4/13/15 9:19 PM, Rick Byers wrote:
>
> Agreed.  I prefer #1,  but I'm biased , having never implemented level 
> 1 ;-)
>

I also prefer #1.

If someone wants a `delta view` of the spec (aka #2 below), that should 
be relatively easy to generate. I would also recommend we keep the 
`Changes since last publication` section up to date.

-ArtB
>
> I'll wait for your house keeping before submitting any PRs.
>
> On Apr 13, 2015 7:45 PM, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com 
> <mailto:Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>     I was going to do some house cleaning to the spec (e.g. make it
>     say “Level 2” or something) to prepare for this stuff first.
>     /But/, it made me realize we should have a conversation about the
>     spec approach.  There’s basically 2 options:
>
>     1)Continue with the current spec and call it Level 2. Adapt
>     features and make changes/extensions to existing algorithms/APIs
>     inline.
>
>     2)Write an extension spec that just documents what’s new and changed.
>
>     I could see either one as being acceptable (e.g. I abstain from a
>     vote :-p). But they would substantially change your PR. So maybe
>     we should just put a stake in the ground and go with one or the other?
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 22:41:21 UTC