W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Add direction-specific pan values to touch-action?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:36:49 -0400
Message-ID: <552CFBD1.6010100@gmail.com>
To: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
CC: Sangwhan Moon <sangwhan@iki.fi>, Dave Methvin <dave.methvin@gmail.com>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 4/13/15 9:19 PM, Rick Byers wrote:
> Agreed.  I prefer #1,  but I'm biased , having never implemented level 
> 1 ;-)

I also prefer #1.

If someone wants a `delta view` of the spec (aka #2 below), that should 
be relatively easy to generate. I would also recommend we keep the 
`Changes since last publication` section up to date.

> I'll wait for your house keeping before submitting any PRs.
> On Apr 13, 2015 7:45 PM, "Jacob Rossi" <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com 
> <mailto:Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>     I was going to do some house cleaning to the spec (e.g. make it
>     say “Level 2” or something) to prepare for this stuff first.
>     /But/, it made me realize we should have a conversation about the
>     spec approach.  There’s basically 2 options:
>     1)Continue with the current spec and call it Level 2. Adapt
>     features and make changes/extensions to existing algorithms/APIs
>     inline.
>     2)Write an extension spec that just documents what’s new and changed.
>     I could see either one as being acceptable (e.g. I abstain from a
>     vote :-p). But they would substantially change your PR. So maybe
>     we should just put a stake in the ground and go with one or the other?
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2015 11:37:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 16 May 2015 00:31:59 UTC