Draft minutes: 2014 December 09 call

The draft minutes from the December 9 voice conference are available at 
the following and copied below:

<http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html>

WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send 
them to the public-pointer-events mail list before December 16. In the 
absence of any changes, these minutes will be considered approved.

-Thanks, ArtB

W3C <http://www.w3.org/>


  - DRAFT -


  Pointer Events Working Group Voice Conference


    09 Dec 2014

Agenda 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0099.html>

See also:IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-irc>


    Attendees

Present
    Art_Barstow, Matt_Brubeck, Scott_Gonzalez, Rick_Byers, Jacob_Rossi,
    Olli_Pettay, Asir_Vedamuthu
Regrets
    Sangwhan_Moon
Chair
    Art
Scribe
    ArtB


    Contents

  * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html#agenda>
     1. Tweak and agree on agenda
        <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html#item01>
     2. Call for Consensus to publish Pointer Events Proposed
        Recommendation
        <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html#item02>
     3. AoB <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html#item03>
  * Summary of Action Items
    <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-pointerevents-minutes.html#ActionSummary>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB

<scribe> Scribe: ArtB


      Tweak and agree on agenda

AB:I posted a draft agenda 
yesterdayhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0099.html.Any 
change requests?

[ None ]


      Call for Consensus to publish Pointer Events Proposed Recommendation

AB:we now have an Implementation report that shows 100% pass for IE and 
FFMetrohttp://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/all.html.As such 
we have met Candidate Recommendation interoperability requirement.
... thanks to Jacob, Asir, Matt for running the tests!

… that's a lot of work!

MB:I'll pass that to my testers (I didn't run them personally)

AB:one commenter submitted a review for the Last Call and that comment 
is tracked 
inhttps://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/Comments-LCWD-2014-11-13.The 
comment resulted in several changes to the spec but none are considered 
substantive.
... does anyone disagree the changes are non-substantive?

[ No disagreement ]

*RESOLUTION: the group agrees the changes made as a result of the 
13-Nov-2014 LCWD review are non-substantive.*

AB:the draft Proposed Rec 
ishttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/publish/tr.html.
... As discussed on December 2 with Philippe 
(http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05), 
<http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05%29,>there are 
two normative dependencies that are not yet at Proposed Recommendations 
(D3E and DOM4).
... we agreed the PE spec is using stable definitions in these 
references and the Draft PR reflects that via the statement "By 
publishing this Proposed Recommendation, W3C expects that the 
functionality specified in this Proposed Recommendation will not be 
affected by changes to DOM Level 3 Events or DOM4 as those 
specifications proceed to Recommendation."
... I would like to determine if there is consensus on the above 
statement. Does anyone object to it or have concerns about it?

[ None ]

*RESOLUTION: the group agrees the PR will not be affected by changes to 
D3E or DOM4.*

AB:given this, it appears we have consensus to publish the Proposed 
Recommendation. Who supports publishing a Proposed Recommendation?

AV:support

JR:support

AB:support on behalf of Nokia

SG:support

MB:support

AB:are there any objections to publishing a Proposed Recommendation of 
Pointer Events?

RB:I do not object

AB:having heard no objections ...

*RESOLUTION: the group agrees to publish a Proposed Recommendation of 
Pointer Events.*

AB:thanks to Everyone for their contributions. It has been a real 
pleasure to work with all of you. I've been very impressed with the 
professionalism exhibited, and getting to PR when we said we would (two 
years ago)!

AV:congrats to the WG

AB:anything else on this topic
... my expectation is the Director's call will be tomorrow


      AoB

AB:any other topics for today?
... Would people like to use the bridge reservation for Touch Events CG?

RB:the main Q is if there is sufficient interest to have a call

… it's ok with me

JR:I'm ok to have a call

RB:in particular, a discussion about events derived from other event types

AB:I think a working assumption then would be for Rick to propose an agenda

… and the CG can use this time slot

RB:ok; I'll send something to the CG list

AB:anything else

… meeting adjourned

… thanks all!

<shepazu> hey, artb, sorry I missed the call

<shepazu> artb, let me know what I need to do to get this published


    Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 16:38:24 UTC