- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:46:21 -0500
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
The draft minutes from the December 2 voice conference are available at the following and copied below: <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html> WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-pointer-events mail list before December 9. In the absence of any changes, these minutes will be considered approved. -Thanks, ArtB W3C <http://www.w3.org/> - DRAFT - Pointer Events Working Group Voice Conference 02 Dec 2014 Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0087.html> See also:IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-irc> Attendees Present Art_Barstow, Matt_Brubeck, Scott_Gonzαlez, Doug_Schepers, Asir_Vedamuthu, Jacob_Rossi, Philippe_LeHegaret Regrets Rick_Byers, Patrick_Lauke, Sangwhan_Moon, Olli_Pettay Chair ArtB Scribe ArtB Contents * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#agenda> 1. Tweak and agree on agenda <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item01> 2. Testing and implementation report status <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item02> 3. LCWD Comment Processing <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item03> 4. Github sync issue <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04> 5. Pointer Events Normative References <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05> 6. AoB <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06> * Summary of Action Items <http://www.w3.org/2014/12/02-pointerevents-minutes.html#ActionSummary> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB <scribe> Scribe: ArtB Tweak and agree on agenda AB:I posted a draft agenda yesterdayhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0087.html.Any change requests? [ None ] Testing and implementation report status AB:I would like to get the status of the testing and Implementation Report AV:the test suite is up to date includes all the findings from last 2 weeks something in the test infra is not in sync AB:is the sync problem the one you mentioned to PLH? AV:yes; we need an update from GH to w3c-test.org my conclusion is it is still out of date so this means we need to use the GH version during the testing AB:so you have done the testing using GH version? AV:yes Matt will file report for Mozilla Jacob will file report for IE AB:thanks for the update ... eventually, the Implementation Report will be inhttps://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/pointerevents after Matt and Jacob upload their data, me or Doug or PLH can then generate the reports can you Doug please ask PLH about an ETA for the sync fix DS:will do AB:my recommendation is for Matt and Jacob to upload their data now Jacob, Matt, can you do that? MB:yes; we found a few bugs and fixed them; we are doing our last round of testing now and if all goes well, I can upload our results tomorrow JR:I think we can submit IE data now we ran our tests on IE fork of w-p-t but that should now be identical to w3c-test.org so we are good to go AB:can you upload the results today Jacob? JR:yes AB:anything else on testing? thanks very much Asir, Jacob and Matt! I really appreciate your work, especially knowing there are a ton of manual tests! LCWD Comment Processing AB:currently, the only LC commenter is Josh Soref and he submitted 42 commentshttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0076.html. ... yesterday, I checked in changes for 26 of his comments, all editorialhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0089.html. ... Jacob agreed to reply to the other 16 comments and my expectation is he will act on those today. JR:yes, that's right a few we might we want to talk about #12, is about uniqueness of the pointerID think this is mostly clear but Josh mentions some scenarios will add something like " in the document " to address this the current impls work that way #31 "what happens if " asking for guidance similar to MQs and hover I intend to add a Note will look at MQs for text to borrow or create my own text <plh> oki AB:any other comments that are work discussing DS:I think most of Josh's comments were editorial in nature and I agree with Jacob's proposed way of handling them AB:anyone else [ None ] AB:will you reply to Josh today? JR:yes; I'll commit changes today just need to do the push AB:re comment tracking, I propose just creating a Wiki document and if that's agreeable, I'll take the lead to create it and maintain it. I'm also happy to defer to any way you recommend JR:a wiki is fine what about revision history for these comments? AB:just one list item for Josh's comments is OK Github sync issue PLH:do you check Asir? AV:I have no way of checking except to run a test no timestamp, for instance PLH:I was told it was fixed late yesterday evening if there are any probs, let me know I think you are OK now AV:ok; thanks Philippe! PLH:I can double-check if needed AV:thanks; all clear now Pointer Events Normative References AB:I sent outhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014OctDec/0092.htmltoday PLH:so D3E and DOM4 I recall discussing this before and I think we are OK JR:yes PLH:MouseEvents and MouseEventInit are in D3E for Director, can say MouseEvents are in D3E but they were defined in D2Events re the constructor, we need a test JR:yes, we have that test in the test suite IE and FF both pass it PLH:in that case, you are fine <jrossi>https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/pointerevents/pointerevent_constructor.html AB:sounds like we are in OK shape for the refs PLH:yes, should be OK <jrossi> run it here:http://w3c-test.org/pointerevents/pointerevent_constructor.html <plh>http://w3c.github.io/beacon/#terminology AoB AB:any other topics for today? ... Patrick suggested we take up Touch Events at some meeting. that's fine with me but getting PE to REC is the highest priority at the moment PLH:have you looked at WebDriver API? JR:yes; coordinating with John Jansen we submitted some comments hope to get those done in v2 AB:meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 16:46:53 UTC