- From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:01:36 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Patrick, why do you have to make such good points? :-p Yes, without a doubt A should list the other memebers of this group--without you fine folks, we wouldn't be publishing a LCWD. For B, this isn't a required list to have but something we've been doing for convenience along the way. I wouldn't expect the final REC to have this list, so I wonder if now's the time to just remove it from the spec. Art, wdyt? -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:05 PM To: public-pointer-events@w3.org Subject: Re: Draft LCWD available On 11/11/2014 17:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 11/11/14 11:33 AM, Pointer Events Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> ACTION-145: Create draft lcwd and ping the list for review >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/145 > > The draft LCWD is now available and set for publication on November 13: > > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/default/publish/tr.html > > > > If you have any comments, please send them as soon as possible. Just a small query about A. and B. at the end of the document: - should A include the list of people in this WG (I know, a fairly transparent question ;) ) - have there been any noteworthy changes that need to be added to B Or is this something that gets done at a later stage in the process (admitting that I'm not familiar with the way of the W3C). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 00:02:06 UTC