W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: "List of Pointer Events" table default actions

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:04:08 +0000
Message-ID: <52DEFCE8.60501@splintered.co.uk>
To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 21/01/2014 16:38, Rick Byers wrote:
> Thanks Patrick!  Normally we just discuss potential changes over e-mail
> (although in the past the changes have been simple enough that it's easy
> to just include the proposed text in e-mail, possibly not the case
> here).  There is a bug tracker -
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?product=PointerEventsWG.
>   You could file a new bug and put details there if you like.

As you probably see, done 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24346

> Since the compatibility mouse events stuff is listed as optional, I
> think it would be better to avoid complicating 5.2.1 much for them and
> instead leave the discussion to section 11.  Your "If the pointer is
> primary ..." note sounds good to me.

Yup, agree. Made those changes (see code fragment attached to bug) as 
well as a few more (see description).

> I don't really have a strong preference on the ordering - I do like that
> your proposed ordering focuses on the order events are typically seen in
> practice instead of the logical grouping.

Personally, I think this order (in which they're generally fired) is 
more intuitive for a developer, and it will tie in with non-normative 
illustration/flow of how events are fired, once i get to that part).

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 23:04:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:26 UTC