- From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:34:02 +0000
- To: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) <garykac@chromium.org>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
FYI Pointer Events WG: I've gone ahead and made this change since it has no functional impact on the spec. Let me know if you have concerns. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/rev/fff0b8134446 -Jacob > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Rossi [mailto:Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 11:03 AM > To: Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) > Cc: Arthur Barstow; Travis Leithead; public-pointer-events@w3.org > Subject: RE: Pointer Events spec and UIEvents reference > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Gary Kacmarcik (Кошмарчик) > <garykac@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > That was moved into DOM3Events because it didn't make sense to > deprecate the old event initializers without having a replacement. > > See https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dom3events/raw-file/tip/html/DOM3- > Events.html#idl-def-MouseEventInit > > That's good news! I will update Pointer Events to reference this definition > instead. > https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/104 > > > We haven't updated UI Events recently because we've been focusing on > finishing D3E. But we have moved some items from UI Events back into D3E > when we discovered that they needed to be handled properly in D3E (and > couldn't wait for UI Events). Sorry for the confusion this caused you. > > No worries, though perhaps UI Events should be updated now that you don't > intend for these to be defined in that spec. Would be good to avoid further > proliferation of confusion. > > > Overall, this is great news. I'd rather have you depending on D3E than UI > Events at this time. > > Agreed, this is definitely preferable. > > -Jacob
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 22:35:01 UTC